Monday, July 22, 2013

Our last, best, hope?

I first used the internet in 1984/5 when I was a student at Cambridge University sitting at a dumb terminal on an IBM mainframe and  discovered that we could email people both locally and at other universities.  I didn’t know we were using the Internet, of course, because it was just ‘the network’. I had access when I worked at Acorn Computers, and in the early 1990′s ended up at PIPEX, the UK’s first commercial ISP.

A lot of my work at that time revolved around promoting the idea that the Internet was the right way to build the ‘information superhighway’ beloved of Al Gore, Tony Blair and others, rather than closed, proprietary technologies like AOL, Compuserve and the Microsoft Network. These systems were touted as the alternative to the insecure, unmanageable internet, and for a brief period it looked like they might triumph simply because of the marketing effort that went into them, but in the end it was the open net and the open web that came to provide the infrastucture for our networked economies and society.

In the last three decades the internet has become the pipe that delivers the world to us in all the ways that radio and TV used to and all the ways that radio and TV, as one-way broadcast media, never could.  These days there are many countries where it makes far more sense to occupy the offices of the ISPs after a military coup than it does to take over the television stations.

This triumph comes at a cost. We have managed to avoid replacing the cacophony of the somewhat democratic open standards bazaar with a closed-minded architecture of control in which we would be expected to ask for permission to do anything, and would be reliant on Microsoft, AOL  and those who they approve to maintain, develop and deliver innovation, and to charge what they liked for the privilege, but in the process we have built an internet that is almost impossible to manage.

We see it in the chaos of spam, malware and phishing, as well as the impossibility of creating effective filters for material that we’d prefer our children didn’t see, whatever the government may want to believe (and whatever PR hype they may persuade the Daily Mail to print).  Many ISPs would probably prefer a safe, manageable network where they can control what their customers see and do and avoid takedown notices and copyright trolls and excessive legislation to manage illegal and ‘harmful’ content online.  We know what that world looks like – it’s the content industries dream of compulsory digital rights management, premium services and Ultraviolet, but it doesn’t look that attractive to those of us who value the Internet’s creative potential and see it as the foundation of Indoor Positioning System.

We inherited a network which was designed to be open and permissive and to be used by nice people doing nice things. Over the last three decades it has been unleashed onto the world, and the openness of the network has meant that bad people have used it to do bad things, selfish people have used it to do selfish things, and governments have looked for ways to monitor it using the same features that the authors of Tor used to make it hard to monitor.

As a result today’s internet  is more easily used for oppression than openness, and have seen how the US and UK, like China and others, have been reading as much net traffic as they can get their hands on, and how laws have been written to make such surveillance legal.  The latest announcements on filtering mark a move towards deeper monitoring of the material UK net users are downloading, using the argument that we must ‘think of the children’ to justify this.

It may mark the point at which many ordinary users start to worry that the network they increasingly rely on for many aspects of their daily life is in fact the space in which they are most exposed, where their freedom to live their lives without being observed or suspected is most easily removed, because it is just as impossible to enforce the positive freedoms online as the negative ones. We can’t keep people safe from malware or spam, and we can’t tell them they can speak privately or speak openly without fear of reprisal.

ISPs have a real problem here. It’s the one outlined by Tim Wu and Jack Goldsmith in their book ‘Who Controls the Internet?’, where they point out that whatever freedom we may seek online, the net is  delivered to us by companies that have offices and employees and servers, all of which are located in the physical world. For a company to operate  within a territory it has to obey the laws within that territory, and while it seems.

Lake Placid is a small village tucked away in New York's Adirondack Mountains that is best known as the home of 1932 and 1980 Winter Olympics. Surrounded by thickly forested mountains and spread out over two lakes —  Mirror Lake and the namesake Lake Placid — this scenic little village today is valued for its proximity to world-class hiking and skiing as well as the numerous athletic training facilities, camps, and tournaments that utilize its left-over Olympic infrastructure. This town gets a lot of visitors and is packed with hotels, motels and B&Bs to handle the tourist traffic.

The Golden Arrow, which overlooks Mirror Lake, has been owned and operated by the same family since Winifred and Stefanie Hoderied opened it up back in the 1970s. The hotel has seen some improvements and upgrades in the decades since, but the one thing that hasn't changed is the family running the show. Winifred and Stefanie passed the operational torch to their children, Jenn and Peter Holderied, and it's been the new generation who have overseen its emergence as a leader in green hotels.

They grab all the low-hanging green hotel fruit like encouraging their guests to use their towels more than once to cut down on unnecessary laundry loads and offer in-room recycling, but they take their environmental efforts a few steps further with their green roof, thermal solar panels, hot water heat recovery system, and crushed limestone beach (to counteract acid rain on Mirror Lake). We found a a lot of local and organic choices on the menu at Generations, the Golden Arrow's restaurant. That devotion to buying local extends to everything the hotel purchases and they try to reuse building materials whenever they renovate. Their kitchen grease gets hauled off by a local farmer who turns it into biodiesel. Hotel employees get a free lunch if they live within 10 miles and walk or bike to work. Those who live farther out receive a transportation stipend.

Read the full products at http://www.ecived.com/en/.

No comments:

Post a Comment